He Seems Incoherent Because He is!

 I am not going to make this so  much about the OWL.  But she posted something idiotic on her blog today.  Essentially she is one of the people who still give credit to orange Hitler's incoherent communication style under the label he uses for it.  The weave.  

Maybe I have spent too many hours reading psychology texts, and keeping up with the revisions and new editions of  The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, (currently Fifth Edition, to fall for that shit.

Add to that my BA in one of the story telling arts, Theatre.  And all the Communications and Video and Lit classes taken, and it is easy for me to get to the point.  An incoherent communication style, is evidence of an incoherent communication style.  Which itself is compelling evidence of a person having an incoherent mind.  

Particularly as his mental state, said casually and not as a credentialed professional's diagnosis, is demented and deteriorating.  I have to wonder about anyone still buying into that witless drivel about how its a deliberate choice.  He's the president of the fucking USA!  He isn't an avant garde, Hip Hop playwright and or beat box poet.  Perhaps not under Article II specifically, but as national chief executive, it is at least within the reasonable expected duties to be able to clearly articulate things about the nation and his administration of it's affairs, instead of doing "art."

No one should think why can't he do both?  There barely is enough time in the day for even more able people to do "the job."  And this bitch has less talent than a bucket of vomit.  So he fails at both, far as I see.

I am reminded of a sweet, and very attractive girl who worked on the same case with me, years ago.  Our office was located near NYC's Madison Sq. Park.  A lot of homeless people and otherwise mentally dysfunctional folk could be found there, any given day.  So one day we were talking about those kinds of people.  She mentioned to me something about how she liked talking to them.  I, a former family court lawyer who had several clients with issues, previously, could and did not agree.  I said flat out, I try to avoid them.    I literally actually backed away from her, to make a visual point.

Now I an not going to say only crazy people want to talk to crazy people.  But most of the people I know who do are either licensed mental health professionals, or people like lawyers who have a professional reason.

Not all that long after that chat, she got fired.  Her work was usually below quota, but one day she managed to not do any work at all.  I ain't saying she was crazy.  She wasn't incoherent.  But girl was not really living deeply enough in the usual reality most people I know exist in.

As if she had her own version of the weave for how she perceived life, significantly different than the reality based people have.

I am trying to be polite.  She was cute, and nothing but nice to me.  But yeah. Just past eccentric I would have to say.  The kind of difference the current version of the DSM would place on a spectrum you would not want to be, if being considered mostly normal matters to you at least.

Some people just don't give a fuck.

Oh, and one last thing.  orange Hitler is bat shit crazy, and on the bad side of the spectrum for several of these disorders.  Nevermind.  He is pushing 80.  A very unhealthy man, who likely has some organic brain problems that we likely will never know about, for sure.

And I Was Quietly Done With The Owl.

 But this one was too fucking weird to go unshared.

To recap.  The owl is a retired law prof and still blogger who, from her unique POV, blogs.  Sometimes she comes across as a kind of syntax Nazi.  Other times she comes across as a what the fuck you talking bout?  

Try this one.  To  set it up, she posted about some article in the Times, and she is nitpicking the word choices.  

"I wonder how the NYT heard the "quiet conversations" and how, assuming you could hear them, you would know that the interlocutors had a particular feeling and it was unshakable, and how, assuming you would know that, the feelers of the unshaken feeling felt that they knew the contents of the mind of the man in her life, that he both wants to support the woman and doesn't want to admit he's having trouble doing what he thinks he is trying to do."

Firstly.  She speculates all the fucking time, so I do not get why she is so confused by people maybe  speculating.

Secondly,  a quiet conversation is not the same as silent.  Sheesh.

Thirdly, why should everyone be totally literal, even?  Who made her the boss of all media?

Lastly.  I am not going to put her in the same deteriorating mental state category as bozo.  He who is the maga man candidate.  However if a woman spoke like that to me on a first date, I would end it fast, and never want to repeat.

Why Bozo Isn't Losing Polling Points for Being Insane-scary.

I think "The Daily Show" accidentally figured out what is really going on.  However.  I grade hard.  And I love that about myself.

I don't find bozo funny, charming, or at all entertaining.  I have actually had root canal.  And I would put suffering more than five straight minutes of him on a par with root canal.  At least closer to that than five minutes of any true "reality"  TV show.  Which I despise with a passion few can understand, unless they also despise "reality"  TV with a similar passion.  And I mean, where it really isn't a real competition, as in cooking, or singing, or a variety act competition.  And the only one of them I can at all stand is, "The Voice."  And I am far from a loyal viewer.  I am fickle.  Anyway.

My default is you do you boo.  But not when it comes to voting for bozo.  Be amused by him, if that is your low tastes.  But voting for him is a crime against many of your fellow Americans.  And yeah.  That is the point in voting for him.  In all seriousness.

No Mas! He Has Gone From Accidentally Funny, To Pathetic.

 Many American Blacks, and people who have visited Black homes going back as far as the late 1960s, have seen some version of this image.  I will get to that in a minute.

But first, I am trying to be done with Glenn Loury.  I have had periods of time, over the past 10 or more years when I had him on mental ignore.  But he served as a passing adequate source of old school conservative talking points, and yes.  He was frequently accidentally funny when he went all white supremacist.  Defender and or enabler.  I would get bored of his shit.  I would take a break, and come back to his internet channel later, to see what he was up to.

For those of you who know, he was something like Uncle Ruckus, without being in denial about being black.   My opinion  (and assume everything here I say about him is just and only my idiotic opinion.)  But this time the trigger is so perverse, that I have switched the controls on YT to stop notifying me of Loury's latest shit posts.

Now to the reason why, and why the image. above.  Now Loury has a bad habit of getting histrionic, I would say even manic, at times, over his mental processes.  Not over reality.  Over the shit his mind processes.  Sure, he says nutzo shit like how he gets angry about his (Black) people.  But as far as I can tell, he gets angry at his (Black) people for not living the way "he just knows" they should be acting and living.  That is all in his own fucking head!  He is seemingly upset people are not doing what he wants them to do!  The distress is all him as . . .  wait for it . . .  a sane, rational person should not have that much trouble understanding that nobody gotta live their lives the way that one other person thinks they should.  

Granted, that is the core of contemporary GOP thought.  And dysfunction, And why they are evil.  But hey.  My default is, "You do you boo.  As long as you aren't actually hurting any other live human person."  So I take people who want to control other people as flat-out evil, because, that is what evil is.  Fucking with people's universal rights, and shit. But I digress.

Now to the picture,  Loury's last meltdown, observed by me this week.  He constructed in his own chemically damaged (by crack) brain, this nightmare fantasy (for him,) where the old MLK and Dead Kennedy's triple portrait was replaced by one where Kamala Harris was center, and MLK and Obama were flanking.  And he threw a fit, had a pretty damn near hysterical fit, over something he merely thought could happen.  Something which at that point in time, only seemed to exist in his chemically damaged (by crack) brain.  And it was such a fucking trivial thing!  That the mere thought of that imagined, trivial picture leading to emotional distress in someone, is to me, not a psychologist,  evidence of a seriously disturbed mind.

I am not going to tell his buddy, John McWhorter, what to do.  But if I had a friend who was having meltdowns over hypothetical, trivial wall hangings?  I would suggest they get some counseling.  And I would counsel them,  fucking don't post that vid.  McWhorter was in the vid.  He could have withdrawn consent for it to be published,

But that's me.  You do you boo.  You do you.

Get Kristi Kill!

 Puppy killer, to be specific.

I do not have enough data to make a general statement but.  This trashy crazy bitch is only lately coming to understand that not only democrats.  But even other republicans could see her as a trashy crazy bitch.

That is my ultimate question.  Whether or not these GOP Nazis actually or not get it, that they are trashy crazy bitches?

Not, her.  Seems.

The Owl Has Lost it!

 This is so stupid. I think at least.

She says bozo, if needing to be jailed, but wins election, should have to do house arrest in the WH?

She was replying in some way to some commenter on her blog, suggesting bozo might want to get arrested.  Her words: 

"Trump wants a prison sentence? I don't believe that. I think he's fighting hard, in his own stubbornly perverse, insubordinate, rebellious way."

Ok.  This is worse than the house arrest suggestion.  Not so much in disagreeing with the comment about how bozo might want that shit.   I'll get back to that.  But the really stupid shit she is doing here, is she is presuming rational thinking for a carbon based life form known  for, and well documented to not act in a conventionally rational way,  A lot of the fucking time!  

Said plainly, she is acting as if the crazy man isn't.  Even of she thinks he is only acting crazy?  How the fuck do you know what the creature who deliberately is acting crazy, really intends?  The observer with a rational mind knows.   You can't really make a good guess what either the actually crazy person, or the just pretending it, really is thinking.

Now would I bet my last dollar  he wants to go to jail?  I don't think he wants to lose any of his criminal cases.  But I think he considers he might be able to make getting jailed for contempt, to work in his favor.  (Edit to add.  I finally went back and looked at the comment.  That person was making that argument.  OWL might have deliberately blurred that up.  Or maybe accidentally?)

Anyway, The case for he might, sort of, deliberately be pushing for a contempt jailing:

1.  He actually can control himself.  When he gets hit with a gag order,  he complies, if only barely.  And gets his lawyers to appeal that, because

2.  He has it in is head that part of his election strategy is to fight the law . . . that is arrayed against him. His lawyers have said as much in filings, if not in open court, and 

3.  I keep seeing a fundraising ad with him, where he basically rails against the judges and prosecutors.  He is literally using his status as a defendant to fundraise.

I am not sure whether this is at all an effective strategy?  I am willing to believe, that he just might be crazy enough to believe it.  And there are more than a couple analysts who are saying his martyr act is not only part of his campaign, but go so far as to say it might help him, at least with the base.  

But if the base is with him already, what is the fucking point?  I would not be willing to believe the martyr routine is winning him new supporters, without  seeing well executed research from at least three of the best ranked researching outfits saying, yes.  That is helping him outside of the base, in a statistically significant way.

But he might believe it, without the data.  Some people believe shit, without having any data that says, yup.  This  is likely true.  

Crazy people!  Cant figure them out!

Bloodbaths, and Bias, and Brain Farts

 I don't click links to Joe Rogan.  He doesn't merit it.  And I am only mentioning him as the OWL's post that triggered me here?  It deals with something that happened on one of his podcasts.  He had Psychologist Jonathan Haidt on.  And they talked about the now infamous bloodbath comment.  Owl said she was disappointed in him because . . .  badly articulated reasons.  But the seeming gist was, they used an edited clip of the remarks, and Haidt . . . did not condone the use of the extremely violent rhetoric? I guess?

She often fails to attempt to make a point, often.  She often just posts shit, and leave it to the observer to figure out her position or why, why posts the shit?  Here she failed to connect the dots.  She likely would have penalized that level of failing to make sense, when she was a law prof.  I have to guess.  Anyway . . . 

I call her out for being awful.  Just because someone doesn't agree with her, doesn't mean they are "mentally failing," as she says.   Just because someone doesn't share your biases, doesn't mean they are cognitively failing.

Now granted.  One's view on how horrible the bloodbath comment was, may be  greatly affect by how one feels about bozo?  And yet.  Reasonable, neutral minds  could be offended by the use of that bloodbath comment, even given the full context.   Never mind, that according to objective psychologists and people who just grade hard on that kind of violent shit.  The ex president I call bozo, is not what passes for a clear and thoughtful communicator.  So anyone who claims to be sure what the fuck he is saying, isn't. Very often.

Lastly.  As someone who got dinged for saying, "Burn the motherfucker down, metaphorically speaking," on FB.  I can attest to the fact.  Some people have no fucking tolerance for that violent rhetoric, even when the fact it is being used metaphorically is clearly stated.  (Which bozo never does, at first at least.)

But I was  likely dealing with a bot.

But that bot was created by a live human.  I guess.

The OWL is really too fucking willing to cut the crazy ex president slack.  That is how I see it.

The Text of that Petition about Bozo's Mental Disease and Dysfunction.

 The OWL should take note!  But she might post about it  and change words here and there!  

Why this petition matters

Started by John Gartner Ph​.​D.

We, the undersigned licensed medical and mental health professionals (INCLUDE YOUR ADVANCED DEGREE IN YOUR LAST NAME WITH NO PUNCTUATION) believe that, while a definitive diagnosis would require further testing, Donald Trump is showing unmistakable signs of dementia based on his public behavior and informant reports that show progressive deterioration in memory, thinking, ability to use language, behavior, and both gross and fine motor skills. 

1) Decline from baseline:

Overall, he shows a shocking decline in verbal fluency from his previous baseline. He was once highly articulate, with a sophisticated vocabulary, and spoke in polished paragraphs. Now, his vocabulary is impoverished, he often has difficulty finishing a thought, sentence or even a word. Typical of dementia patients he perseverates and overuses superlatives and filler words.

People who worked closely with Trump during his administration are reporting a shocking deterioration in just 4 years.

2) Memory:

Forgetting names and dates is normal for people who are aging (like Joe Biden). But the Dementia Care Society says "confusing people and generations" is a sign of advanced dementia. Recently, Trump confused Nikki Haley and Nancy Pelosi. 8 times he said he was running against Obama. He didn't look like he was joking. An example of confusing generations: Trump said his father was born in Germany, when that was his grandfather. Michael Wolff wrote Trump not infrequently failed to recognize old friends.

3) Language

Trump shows formal signs of disordered speech we typically see only in organically impaired patients. Trump is verbalizing an increasing number of  "phonemic paraphasias. Using non-words in place of real words that may include a fragment of the actual word. For example saying "mishuz" instead of missile, or "Chrishus" insead of Christmas. Sometimes he just uses sounds that don't resemble words at all. 

Trump evidences ‘semantic aphasia’ where he uses words in the wrong way. For example, "the oranges of the investigation."

Trump evidences "tangential thinking" where he drifts from one unrelated thought to another, and sometimes tries to confabulate them into a story. But the narrative is literally incoherent. With increasing frequency he degenerates into literal incoherence, where no one can tell what he was trying to say.

4) Motor:

Trump shows evidence of a "wide based gait" commonly found among patients with dementia. He swings his right leg in a semi-circle as if it were a dead weight. He also show deterioration in fine motor coordination, for example having difficulty drinking a bottle of water.

5) Behavior:

He is showing marked deterioration in impulse control and judgement.

This represents a unique danger because of Trump's pre-existing Malignant Narcissistic Personality Disorder. As he continues to deteriorate he will become even more erratic, impulsive, paranoid, and aggressive than he already is. 

A demented malignant narcissist as president of the United States would have unimaginably catastrophic consequences, and so we feel an ethical obligation to warn the public, and urge the media to cover this national emergency.

Signers, please leave a comment explaining your clinical rationale for signing the petition. Your voice and your words matters

 Link To Petition

Here is an article about it.

"Experts are desperate to warn the public": Hundreds sign Dr. John Gartner's Trump dementia petition

 

 

 

The Main Difference Between Mad King George, and bozo (45. I avoid his name and image.)

 

The main distinction between the Mad King George, and bozo. Other than being born to a ruling family, and not having to run for office, ever.

And the main difference is. Mad King George's family loved him enough to see he was treated. They loved him enough to want him to get better. His wife loved the man she had married so much, she fought to get him back.

I guess the same inference I am making about bozo's family applies to bozo's cult. And let's be honest here. Let's be more honest than the either the political scientists, or otherwise credentialed commentators. It's not just bozo using the fuck faces. The fuck faces are using bozo, as well. He uses them to get power, and some fake sense of value, self worth. Because baby Donnie still needs huge amounts of validation. And they use him as their avatar in a fight against all that they fear and or hate. Because baby MAGA morons still needs huge amounts of validation.

It's a very fucked up, co dependent relationship.

Oh. I tagged the owl here on account. She is not as far as I know a bozo voter. But she falls in a weird category of weird. On paper, she is supposed to be smart enough to see the crazy in bozo for craziness. But she doesn't. She is always coming up with excuses. There is no need for excuses. Crazy shit, past a certain level of quirkiness is just evidence of crazy!

Oh. Here is a good yet not clinically approved, rule of thumb. When the crazy gets past being quirky cuteness, and gets into the delusional and or mean? It's at least a personality flaw, if not personality disorder. Both categories of disorder are treatable by credentialed professionals. Don't condone the disorder and or disease.

About that Charlottesville Hoax Hoax?

Fuck Bobby Lee.

I feel it fair to say that because he was the epitome of a white supremacist, namely, a slave owner, who was a mass murderer for the cause of slavery. He is the God of Race Based, White on Black Slavery.

Now our racist POTUS today made some insane remarks about how that event in Charlottesville, that was organized by and for white supremacists, was not organized by and for white supremacists, as has been well documented. But he argued it was for support of the God of Race Based, White on Black Slavery; Bobby Lee. Well if it was like that, instead of organized by and for white supremacists, you still have a task as hard as Diogones' quest for an honest man in Athens to find very fine people on the other side of the anti-racists, and anti-Confederates.

But the Unite the Right rally was actually organized by and for white supremacists. Bobby Lee is a red herring, and not really a helpful defense for Bozo’s fine people on both sides, racist lie.

Bobby Lee Was a White Supremacist

How gullible and vapid does one have to be to buy into either the Myth of Bobby Lee, or the Myth About Who Organized the Unite The Right rally, and what it was about?  Some people will believe any comfortable bullshit, that confirms their bias.

After all, we can't let one group of perfectly respectable racists, people who love the Slavery Loving Confederacy, be defamed by association with another group of much less respectable racists; generic white supremacists. That would be so very unfair!

Fuck CPAC.

And Fuck All Conservatives!

 

 

And the irony is We Dems  are more afraid of Christe than that grifter, skank Palin.  Christie is not insane.  He has cross over appeal.  And by that I mean, the most insane  and the (few seeming)  sane GOPers  could unite behind him.

As much as I can say it would be  good for the GOP to dump all the tea baggers?  As a Yella  Dog Dem  it pleases me to see the GOP as the party  taken over by imbeciles.

Revisiting an Old Theme. GOP Sociopathy.

The song remains the same.  Over the past week we have had that gomer  Re. West equate  Social Security with slavery.  There's some state level gomer who wants  single parenthood  legally criminalized as child abuse.  New polling data shows GOPers actually dislike P. Obama  more than the Health Care Reform  Act.  Romney is a robot.  The GOP Congress is going to waste time and money once again  voting to overturn the ACA.  Various gomer  GOP Govs are promising not to expand Medicare.  And just to make sure she stands out of the crowd, Az's Jan Brewer is suing to get the requirement to provide benefits to same sex marrieds  overturned.

And the GOP would say we are picking on them for calling them sociopaths.

I Love Being Proven Sort of Right.

File this one under The Persistence of Republican Redneck Racism.  I used to toss off as a guesstamated figure that around a good 1/3 of Republicans were still flat out racists.  I did not mean just a little bit.  I meant FLAT OUT.  Guess I was right at least for Mississippi.  Alabammy  is slightly less odious.  Only a bit more than 1/5 or so are hard core racist, that is if you accept the premise that one has to be a hard core racist to think interracial marriage should be illegal.

Here we are in the 21st Century.  The Democratic Party is, at least.  The GOP  is still suck in the 19th Century.  Lots of the membership, at least.

Go Here.

On Monday, polling firm Public Policy Polling (PPP) revealed that 29 percent of self-identified Republicans surveyed in Mississippi believe that interracial marriage should be illegal. Fifty-four percent said intermarriage should remain legal, and the rest responded that they weren't sure. The survey also found that 21 percent of self-identified Republicans polled in Alabama believe that interracial marriage should be illegal.

And I thought the stats that came out recently about how many of them Deep South rednecks thought P. Obama  was a Muslim was mostly just Redneck Republican truthiness.  But the Deep South is still a shit hole of way too much racism.  Seems to me.

Breitbart, Limbaugh, Right Wing Reverence for Sociopathy, and Dysfunction.

EDITED TO ADD:  (Turns out the time line doesn't support Ann Althouse's Theory.  But talk about truthiness!  I am not deleting my post off the blog as, mostly it's about  the freaky pathology of the right wing;  the perverse and pathological games the pundits play, and the inexplicable respect for that shit, on the part of the rank and file wing nuts.  Not really is this about her.  When I post about her it's usually not really about her.  I use her as the starting point for the monologue.)



Perhaps the most disturbing thing about the reactions to Andrew Breitbart's  (I will not say untimely, since he wasn't a heart attack waiting to happen but was the foreseeable second one,) is what he was praised for.  Mostly by his friends and admirers, but even some of his opponents have praised his drive, his passion, his fearlessness.  And such.  Now I am not saying that objectively all that is evidence of mental illness.  But all you have to do is watch any of several videos of that raging lunatic to know he was a raving lunatic. 

He was unbalanced.  He was rude.  He was antisocial.  He was ugly.  He was manic.  He was out of control.  I believe I already posted here, some blogger's  take on that.  That blogger, a 10 year veteran of law enforcement,  quickly went to crazy, on drugs, or both,  in a "state of mind" description of Breitbart.  I would not doubt if he was a user.  But I think he was mostly crazy.  If they find a tumor the size of a lemon in his brain, I will be no more surprised than I was to find out he dropped dead.

Now transition to Rush Limbaugh, by way of (as I call her)  silly person  Ann Althouse.  Who is not always silly.  Sometimes she can see the forest for the trees, and vice versa.  And this time her observation was spot on. Well  seems so, I'd agree. 

Doing a day after the fact  post concerning Limbaugh's (insufficient) apology to the woman he cruelly called a slut, she made the following observation, concerning Limbaugh:

My other theory about Rush — which Meade doesn't want me to publish — is that he just had to seize the spotlight back from Andrew Breibart, who'd gotten so much attention by dropping dead at the age of 43. Everyone was talking about Breitbart, as if Breitbart had been the biggest thing in right-wing media. We'll never see his like again... and Rush felt compelled to say something truly outrageous. He's always saying he knows how to play the media, to do his "media tweak of the day."

(Go Here.)

Her first observation there, is easy for me to believe.  It is so easy for me to believe that Limbaugh, either deliberately, or merely out of his depraved, infantile, twisted narcissism, went the extra mean vicious mile, to increase attention on him.  How could I not, once that flag gets sent up the flagpole?

 But that second part, to me, is more sociopathic.  What kind of idiot gets their joy out of tweaking the media? That's just some idiotic,  stupid, pathological game playing.  Not only who would get joy out of it, but who would respect that shit?  (Never mind the fact he got rich doing that pathological shit.  Who are the people who get off on it?)  And to explain, it is more sociopathic to me because  it is the same kind of pathetic, immature  attention  getting misbehaviour.  But if one is deliberately  doing it on a large scale?  And to what end?  What is the point in that sort of demented, dysfuntional activity?

I'll end there.  I will not go much further on right wing love of sociopathy.  I have already written many words on that subject.  I don't need to go deep there, now.



Edit to add:

The link to that LEO  blogger  who marked Breitbart as crazy, druggie, or both.

Oh Well. I Feel Tired. From Repeating Myself.

Even if watching Ricky Santorum is comedy, if anything serves as evidence that the GOP needs to go, it is the fact that he is still in the race.

Stepford Wife Bachman Imploded.

Lawn Jockey Cain Imploded.

Why the fuck is Santorum still here?  And I sorta know that.  The christianist faction love him for the very reasons sane people think he is out of his fucking mind.

If Sarah Palin had a penis, and bad hair, she might be Santorum.  Not as stupid as their enemies say, but still, fucking stupid.  Dangerously so.


Oh.  And Poor Newt.  He better say/do something insane soon.  No one is paying any attention to him.  And in a marginally saner party, he'd be the outer limits of indulgence for stupid crazy candidates. 

Insane Ordinary Republican of the Year.

She Need Intensive Professional Help.

Ok.  Now I know for something of a fact that some Herb Cain fans went all verklempt when the perverted, philandering dog of pathological liar suspended his campaign.  One in particular I know of, is quite mad, quite out of his mind.  He was going to get my "Insane, Most Needs Professional Mental Health Treatment,  Ordinary Republican" Award for 2011.  Then I saw this vid.  Part of me just wants to think this is bullshit.  The other part of me thinks this is real, no so much because of the way the woman acts, cries, but the way the other woman off cam really seems to be sincerely reacting to her.  Never the less.  This year's award is a Tie between the crazy dood I mentioned, and this chick. 

Now I am only a lawyer who worked on a Risperdal case.  So no one should take me seriously if I say this lady might need some, or some med from the same class.  But lady definitely needs some treatment if she busts out in tears upon reading that Granpa Paul is a big old meanie when it comes to siding with Israel.  I mean really.  Crazy and stupid, because the one thing you can say about Granpa Paul is that he's like a broken record.  Been playing the same song, not only for not only years and years, but decades and decades.

(Oh.  The first version of the vid I saw was just the chick.  Version I linked to here has the set up by Cenk Uygur.  And he says one of my favorite lines!  "There's No Crying in Politics!"  Excellent!)

It's Just The Internet, People! Get Over Your Insane Selves, and Get Treatment. And Some Meds!!!

Ok.  I haven't even referenced by allusion, Althouse, for a few days, never mind mention by name.  But there has been some freaky deaky shit going down there, and well, collateral to her blog.  Short of it is  (and mind you I made my own critical remarks here, a couple weeks ago so about it,) the scandal involves a new  . . . standards for deletion of the shit the minions post, policy over there.  Allegedly, according to management over there, they are getting rid of the "clutter."  So I really can't compliment them on a job well, done for the right reasons.  It's all sort of arbitrary and capricious.  The new commenting policy.  And that's fair, in so far as long as one is being honest about being arbitrary and capricious. 

For example.  I have said,  here, that my right to tell people to shut the fuck up matters more to me than their claimed right of free speech.  Fuck 'em.  My blog.  It's all about meeeeeeee!  So no matter what I do  (and let's be honest, I don't get many comments here) I am being consistent with my non existent policy.  However, and I am just saying out loud, if one were to say they have a real policy and not stick to it.  Or if one uses  some fucked  up like a street corner ho junkie, meaningless words to define their policy, like "good faith,"  one is begging to be pilloried as a bullshit person.

I'll stop there but to say, there is now some fucked up feud between some old commenters  from the blog, and the couple who run the blog.  And . . .  between the whole fucking lot of them  there is a lot of dysfunction going on, and plenty of work for therapists and clinicians, for years and years.  JMO.  And I say that as someone who has been sucked up in Internet drama.  I am ashamed of it.  And even if at the time I know it was fucked up stupid childish nonsense, I got sucked in, and  and regrettably, I went there.  Again, embarrassment.  Not so much for what I specifically said or did, mind you, but for not saying  fuck this stupid shit, I am not getting in that deep. 

Again. People!  It's only the fucking Internet, people.  Get over it!

Edit to add:
(And I confess, I came back and edited my edit.  I did not need to be so much of a flame thrower here.   I have really been so NOT into the season this year, and fucking sick of the fuckers  who spew and spurt about the war on christianity, bullshit.  Sorry.  There I go again.  Sorry.  Ok.  I have been so not into the season I am definitely testy.  And cuss mouthed.  Anyway . . .)

Thing was about this 'atheist creche' that was put up in Madison.  Althouse commented about it, and likewise her minons  in the comments section ran on about that shit, totally missing the obvious.    The "display" was not an affirmative argument for atheism.  It was patently, obviously  a mockery of not only religion, but of religious "displays." But seriously,  people.  If you waste your time  trying to deconstruct  full on mockery, you really missed the fucking point.
Some people just fail to get the obvious.  On account of having their heads so far up their asses they can lick the insides of their their own throats.

Worst Fucking Republican of the Year.

It's so hard to say.  So many insane, evil, lying Republicans.  I have not bothered to go back over and find out for sure who got the most posts by me this year, but for wretchedness above and beyond the rest of the field, I gotta  give the title to Herb Cain.

Yes, I am disgusted with the way Herb pandered to some of the most base and vile stereotypes.  He fucking sang at a fucking press conference, for crying out loud!  He made Stepinfechit look as regal as James Earl Jones, as the king in that Eddie Murphy movie, "Coming to America."  He out minstreled  (what's his name) Al Jolson singing."Mammy."   

But that is not the worst of it  -- granted I have not seen a (allegedly legit, meaning not counting Rent Too Damn High, man,)  black politician more shaming to the black community since Keyes.  And Herb was so much worse.  At least Keyes was just some crazy negro.  Herb is a crazy negro, who's a pathological liar, and got some serious problems with the wimmen folk.  But the worst of the worst was Cain's own black on black racism.  Saying  the 90-95 or more % of black folk who vote were "brainwashed," was flatly, plainly racist.  Take the words out of a white racist's mouth and make them come out of a black mouth, and it's still racist.  Likewise, that shit about the plantation.  Negro please!  And then there was the shit about Muslims.  And the shit about how racism really wasn't holding any black folk back, until . . . . he felt justified in recycling the (ludicrous, then as it was this year)  whiny crank about how having one's own sordid record of mistreating women made public =  a high tech lynching.

I'll stop there about him.  Particularly.  I have talked enough about him the past few months, and I hope he enjoys his spot on shit heap of shit head, dick nose failed GOPers.  But I do want to make a few remarks  about his supporters.  Could you have been more fucking stupid?  I mean really!  I have used the analogy coming from the joke with Snow White sitting on Pinocchio's  face saying,"Lie to me," before.  But ya know?  That won't work here.  At least Snow White was deliberately trying to get fucked.  But Cain supporters?  Well I think the best analogy is what allegedly happened in the car when he tried to get the blonde to suck him off in exchange for a favor.  But in this case, his supporters were willing to go down on that pizza man's sausage.

Oh.  This is fucking hilarious.  To me at least.  Now this one fucking idiot on this message board I used to waste my time at?  He (racist fuck wad to my mind, but still  . . . this is part of the pathology of the Cain Train.  Many Southern Racists supported him, before any really had to vote for him, as if he were Unka Remus hissself!, anyway)  he was soooo heartbroken when Cain pulled out  (pun intended) that he broke down on the board like  a little girl. 

That's not proof that all Cain supporters are emotionally disturbed.  I know that fuck wad is.   Again, it is because of crazy, wing nut,  tea bagger fuckers like that,  that I have all but given up message boards.  More's the point, I have given up on most GOPers.

Yes.  I have said it before and I will say it again.  I have no patience left for these fucking fools.  If that were not the case before The Cain Train, it certainly would be the case now. 

Oh.  And that other racist piece of garbage, Ron Paul, the angry libertarian version of Grandpa Simpson, very well might win in Iowa.  Well it could be worse.  It could be Newt.  But that's 2012's bag of shit.  We are still trying to tidy up from 2011.

Herbie's Gone! Now Let's Move On!

Apologies to Curtis Mayfield, but I had to riff off of that ghetto fabulous chart, "Freddie's Dead."

Cain has gone down the drain, kiddies. And he went out in not so much a bang, but a much too long, way too narcissistic, pathological, sociopathic winding speech. It was evocative of Skulls Palin, Arctic Cyborg Unit's swan song (before becoming a sell out professional media ho.) Main difference is Cornbread Cain is more articulate, even if equally vapid and self loving, and victim status embracing.

That's all I got now. That should be enough.

So She's A Hot Mess. You Say That Like It's a Bad Thing. So What The Hell's You're Point?

Personally I have given up on GOP chix. No matter how hot a hot mess, I am no longer attracted to GOP chix, because I end up fucking broke, or feeling like someone has been trying to slowly kill me over time, if not faster than that. But that's the lessons of life for me, at this point.

But I have seen that the sexist, evil lying tea bagger faction of the GOP is bringing out the sharp and deadly knives against Sharon Bialek. Now if you want to see misogyny, watch the wing nuts. But after seeing the "classic" smear job on the Cain Victim, I have to say, so she's a hot mess? What of it? It's not her personality and character that's at issue here. It's the fuck face who claims to want to be POTUS.

This sordid new chapter, now that there is a face and name behind the accusations, is all the evidence any rational person needs to know, to know that at it's core the GOP is an evil, wicked thing. Never mind the shell game they usually play. No bitches. What ever the fuck happened with Clinton does not have a place in this debate. That's ancient history and is not at issue. Likewise, bitches. Clarence Fucking Thomas, no matter how many real or not parallels can be drawn, has no bearing on the issues of the moment. Those issues are properly, whether Cain is a dog. Whether he is a liar? Whether he is a sociopath? Whether he is mentally well? And I use that term instead of stable and I don't think he quite qualifies as generally unhinged, or bi polar, catch him on a bad day and he's boiling the cat alive, because he's angry and bored. But Cain is insane in the membrane. And many of these wing nuts admire that about him.

The GOP is is an evil, wicked thing. And far too impressed by the veneer of charm that barely disguises sociopathy. But that is what so many of the unimpressive, emotionally and intellectually stunted base aspire to be: a full fledged, powerful, evil bastard. Sociopath. Same fucking thing.