Last Night's Debate, Oddly Enough, Accurately Described by Some Wingnut Law Professor.

Make no mistake. I despise the man I call "Some Wingnut Law Professor." Firstly he's a partisan wing nut hack who lacks the self awareness that he is a political hack. In the same vein, his political analysis is as valuable, usually, as a randomly selected 6th grader's explanation of how the Derivatives market works. I will be blunt. He usually doesn't seem to know what the fuck he is talking about, when it comes to politics. He's immature. Bratty. Whiny. A Right Wing Concern Troll (particularly where that Snow Billy Grifter Palin is concerned.) And he thinks he's clever. In that pathological way that wing nuts think they are funny and really are not. (And that's why there have been so few professionally successful right wing comedians or humorists, or comedy movie/play/TV screenwriters. But I digress . . .) He basically sucks. And visiting his page is rubber necking for me.

Anyway, today was his broken clock day. He actually was a little clever and actually was far more insightful than he even realized, I am sure. I will have to explain that down stream. But to set it up he did this "cute" review of last night's debate by matching the GOP candidate to lyrics from "popular" American songs that might best represent their view of how they and or the rest of the debate went. Go Here to See.

Now let me get to the zinger, the unintended insight professor wing nut achieved here. But first let me say his "cute" suggestions for the song lyrics were borderline clever in their own right. And I would say the literary device was all by itself likely the first time I saw him do anything remotely clever. But here is the unintentional brilliance he achieved. In employing that device, in doing a rather good job of matching pop tunes to GOP candidates, he makes the case that this batch, individually, and as a group, has to be the most trivial, un serious batch of GOP Hopefuls in decades, if not ever. By extension he makes the point that the current state of the GOP is now more trivial, and un serious than it has ever been.

And for the coup de grâce. He is implicating himself as being most trivial, and un serious. After all, he is a wing nut himself. And he did not get how deeply cutting his remarks were. That is unless he intended to indict the whole GOP Conservative movement as most trivial, and un serious, and in doing so, himself.

Game. Set. Match. Way to defeat your own self, professor.