Most Stupid Shit Said By a Wingnut This Week. And it's Only Tuesday . . .

At first I was going to go after silly person Ann Althouse, whining how people call that hate mongering mob of racist minions at her blog, racists. I actually had something typed up and decided naaaah. But now that the evening is here I am going with something said by some other wing nut law professor. I think it was that prick who blogs as Instapundit. He (or which ever prick, wingnut law professor it was) attempted to debunk Hillary Clinton's famous,"It Takes a Village," meme. The lever he tried to use was some report about how in Africa kids raised in traditional nuclear families turn out as well as those raised by the village.

Way to miss the point, prick.

Hillary Clinton was making the point that we are not merely a bunch of families. We are not just a bunch of households. We are a community, prick. We are a society, prick.

Oddly enough it was seeing (finally) the video of the guy pulled out from under the car. Bunch of civilians helped the cops and who ever lift the car and get the trapped guy out, that inspired me to post this.

Now you pricks . . . that's a village at work. Ya pricks!

The Preamble Begins . . . "We the People of the United States." Silly Person!

On Thursday night I posted a mini rant against Silly Person, and Queen Bee of an Infamous Internet Hate Group (have you ever seen her commenter's out put? Sickening!) Ann Althouse. I was ranting about her reaction to a line in P. Obama's speech. The crucial line:

"But there has always been another thread running throughout our history – a belief that we are all connected; and that there are some things we can only do together, as a nation."

She opined thusly:

"What bothered me so much? It was the belief that we are all connected. The idea of the collective. We are one, and the one is the government."

I went back the next morning and deleted my first rant, as I made the thing all about me, and that was wrong. So let me restate the core argument.

Now folks. This is an American Lawyer. Who is a law professor. A Constitutional Law professor. Who doesn't get it. Doesn't get America or the ideas that led to the drafting, and ratification of the US Const. Who does not appreciate the axiomatic fact that the US Const. is the product of We the People. Not a bunch of individuals oddly enough who randomly ended up in the same place to at the same time create the US Federal Government only exercising their rugged, individual free will. And like it or not, not only is there no daylight between We the People and the US Federal Government, but there's nothing remotely close to a line of division between the two.

But there is daylight, there is a bright line between mere ideological advocacy, and acting in a deliberately ignorant fashion, in public. But that's not we the people talking. That's my pov, though.

I haven't cussed yet, have I? Ok. Here goes. The fucking line is "We the People." Not we persons. It's really that fucking simple a thing!